Couldn't have said it better myself but *10000 for Gordo and his clowns.
Monday, 24 August 2009
Sunday, 23 August 2009
Saturday, 22 August 2009
Monday, 17 August 2009
Friday, 14 August 2009
Thursday, 13 August 2009
Thursday, 6 August 2009
Listen to this load of rubbish. Even in the dark ages we didn't have such utter morons telling people they knew the future the way this prize plum does. They are using snake oil to try and sell fascism. Everyone needs to tell them to fuck off and fuck off now, or millions if not billions will suffer.
News Corp is set to start charging online customers for news content across all its websites.
The media giant is looking for additional revenue streams after announcing big losses.
The company lost $3.4bn (£2bn) in the year to the end of June, which chief executive Rupert Murdoch said had been "the most difficult in recent history".
Mr Murdoch said he was "satisfied" that the company could produce "significant revenues from the sale of digital delivery of newspaper content".
"The digital revolution has opened many new and inexpensive methods of distribution," he added.
"But it has not made content free. Accordingly, we intend to charge for all our news websites. I believe that if we are successful, we will be followed by other media.
"Quality journalism is not cheap, and an industry that gives away its content is simply cannibalising its ability to produce good reporting," he said.
Oh this really is funny. His range of newspapers are going the way of the dodo, along with the rest of the dead tree press. He knows that, because the demographics show that it is only the older generation that clings to this format. People will take a copy of a paper for free when getting on a train, but the internet has changed everything. With devices becoming ever more portable and document viewing devices becoming better by the day; why would anyone want a printed piece of yesterdays news. That format is all but obsolete.
So Murdoch now thinks this his range of websites will be able to charge. Well, if he was right about the quality of content, then I may have agreed. Let's face it though. There isn't much quality in the Murdoch stable. All of his papers are biased, establishment rags that filter the news to the lowest common denominator. The Telegraph is probably the only site it check on now and then, but believe me, if I have to pay, then it will be no great loss.
The real news comes from the agencies such as Reuters and AFP, again heavily filtered, but certainly there is some useful news there. All of the media use these organisations as their springboard. Indeed, if you read a copy of the Mirror or the Sun, you would be mistaken for thinking it was the same paper or website sometimes. Maybe they will put their own filtered view on that news, but really I can't think of anything worthwhile that has ORIGINATED from the established rags or their sites for some time.
No, if Murdoch thinks his propaganda is actually what people want and will pay for in the online world, he is in for a sharp shock. Blogs and alternate media sources are taking over the comment arena, which is what a lot of people are interested in. We simply don't need Murdoch's rags or sites anymore, so if he starts making them pay sites, he will see his readership shrink to almost zero over night.
Which for me is good. The MSM have served their establishment masters far too well and not the people. The sooner empires like Murdoch's fall, the better and this sort of move will bring that day much closer.
Tuesday, 4 August 2009
I started to watch this video with high hopes, but ended up disliking a large chunk of it. For sure I agree with their right to free speech and I liked the way they stood up for the little people against the bullying council busy bodies, who went after street artists with relish.
But the video and these people lost their way. From defending the little man, they decided to have a go at McCains. Why have they gone against McCains? Because THEY have decided that McCains are not healthy.
Well sorry guys, you are entitled to your opinion, but you are talking a lot of bullshit. Their chips really are a lot healthier than a huge amount of foods out there. They are baked rather than fried and potatoes are actually one of natures best vegetables. Indeed, if you had to survive on a desert island and could only choose one vegetable, the humble potato would see you last the longest.
They go on to whine that they are encouraging kids to do exercise. They seem to think that kids have free access to fields and that McCain are evil for setting up a little bit of activity for them.
Yes you have a point with the council, but your bullying of the staff at this event didn't go down well with me. I wish I was there, because you would have got a dose of my free speech on your moralising on this one.
Well done to the McCain staff for not telling them to go fuck themselves.
Monday, 3 August 2009
A BBC presenter accused of hitting a boy with a wooden pole has been found guilty of unlawful wounding and perverting the course of justice.
Ashley Blake, 40, who presents Midlands Today, denied attacking Greg Jones, 17, outside his Place 2 B bar in Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, in January.
He was cleared of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.
The judge at Birmingham Crown Court warned the presenter he could face a custodial sentence.
Blake was remanded on bail and sentencing was set for 2 September.
Now if this was a political party, the BBC would be the first to tar all of its members with the same brush. They do it all the time to any party that DARES lean to the right, or even the uber left leaning BNP, who just happen to disagree with the rest of the left on race. Well the BBC now has a range of violent attackers, verbal abusers and other assorted criminals. Maybe soon they will have Unite Against BBC, or Anti-BBC Leagues calling for them to be shut down.
They should stop stealing our money that is for sure, but even I wouldn't demand they be closed down if they can find enough mugs to voluntarily fund their establishment whoring organisation.
That's the point though. You as an individual have no choice but to fund this shower of shite, if you want to dare watch ANY T.V.
There is no case for the BBC to be funded using stolen money. Not because one of its employees is a violent child abuser, but because stealing is wrong full stop.
Airbrushing should be banned in advertisements aimed at children to tackle "body image pressure", say the Liberal Democrats.
Altering photos to make them look better means children are subjected to "completely unattainable images", said front-bencher Jo Swinson.
The "Liberal" Democrats call for stuff to be banned again shocker. This bunch of knee-jerk retards always go for ban first, think of the consequences later.
But what are the consequences of stopping "airbrushing".
Well for one, it means a whole raft of people will lose their jobs.
1) The airbrushers who just help out where make up fails.
2) The models who aren't quite up to scratch, but with a little touch up are fine. Kiss your jobs goodbye, as only perfect will be accepted for work in the future.
Next we have to consider if creating near perfect images IS such a bad thing. Has anyone actually thought that some kids might see perfection as a good thing to aim for? You know, lay of the McDonalds, do a bit of exercise and be a healthier and better looking person for it!
How about the fact that kids aren't thick. They know more about photoshop that the Muppets at Lib Dem HQ do. Seeing perfect images can be written off as computer cheating, while if that is banned, the near perfect models that will be demanded by agencies in the future, will be oh so real. That's right kids, computers aren't used and that means you are ugly without computers help. Not so easy to swallow then is it!
What will be the Lib Dem's solution to that? Ban some more stuff I would guess. Ban good looking people from adverts. Ban adverts. Ban companies from trying to sell their wares.
There is nothing Liberal about the Lib Dems. They are authoritarian fools, who think people are stupid and have to be mollycoddled from cradle to grave. They can't bare the thought that people actually do understand the creation of image and that all airbrushing does, is mean perfection can be created from imperfection and that most of us imperfect souls can take heart that is what really happens.
My contempt for Labour and Blue Labour is bordering on epic, but somehow, this bunch of utter clowns take it one step further. The sooner this establishment wing man is destroyed, the sooner this country might get a REAL liberal party, that truly does believe in freedom.
Saturday, 1 August 2009
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - A former speech-writer for Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt has in a report accused the EU of creating an illegitimate "propaganda machine."
Maria Rankka, who worked for Mr Bildt in 1999, currently runs the Swedish pro-free markets think-tank Timbro, which in a paper out this week says that Brussels is overstepping its mandate of facilitating cross-border co-operation.
Commuters who drive to work face a new 'parking tax' of up to £350 a year.
Ministers are backing a 'workforce parking levy' which will come into force in Nottingham in 2012 - and is likely to be adopted across the country.
The pilot scheme will see firms with more than ten parking places for staff charged £250 a year for each, rising to £350 in two years.
Seriously people. How much more of this bullshit is the working man going to take? These parasites are running out of ways to rape us, so they aren't even trying to do it by stealth anymore.
Are we just going to sit back and allow this country to become like a burned ex-Soviet shithole? Is this what we want for our kids? Or are we going to stop dancing to their authortarian criminal tune?
DEMAND YOUR FREEDOM BACK. Join LPUK